RotoWire Partners
RotoWire Blogs
All Sports
Baseball
Football
Basketball
Hockey
Golf
Recent Comments
Featured Bloggers
Chris Liss
Jeff Erickson
Dalton Del Don
Andre' Snellings
Erik Siegrist
Jason Thornbury
Peter Schoenke
Multi-Media
About RSS
Podcasts
More info
FANTASY LEAGUES
Baseball Commissioner
FANTASY FOOTBALL
Fantasy Football News
Fantasy Football Draft Kit
Fantasy Football Magazine
Football Draft Software
FANTASY BASEBALL
Fantasy Baseball News
Draft Kit
Magazine
Draft Software
Email Reports
Email Preferences

RotoWire.com Football Blog
Search All of RotoWire.com Blogs:

BlogsAll Sports   Baseball   Football   Basketball   Hockey   Golf  

Worst Team Web Site
I dare anyone to find a piece of useful news on this site that isn't at least a week old. Plus the design is clunky and terrible. http://www.vikings.com/ Which other official team web sites stink or are really good?

Posted by Peter Schoenke at 9/15/2006 4:01:00 PM
Comments (3)

How Good Can Frank Gore Be?
It's Tuesday, the dust has settled on opening weekend, and everyone is rightfully chattering about Frank Gore. He's flying up "who to start" rankings, being bargained for in leagues everyone, and prompting fantasy owners to rush out and pick up brand new Number 21 Niners jerseys. Okay, maybe not that last part.

Of course, this sort of thing always happens after the first week. Players put up big numbers, become overrated, and then come back to earth. And fantasy owners - thirsty for tangible evidence upon which to base their decisions - read way too much into the initial batch of numbers and inevitably overreact. Is that happening here? Or are we seeing the emergence of a fantasy monster?

There is no denying that Gore had a monster first game, racking up 170 total yards and two scores. So what to make of it? Is he the next Shaun Alexander (1,318 yards and 16 touchdowns for a mediocre Seattle team in his first full season in 2001) or the next Quentin Griffin (156 yards and 3 scores in his first start of 2004, only to finish with 311 yards and those same 3 touchdowns for the season)?

After watching the Niners-Cards game from Sunday, I was struck by how solid Gore was in every facet of the game. He finishes his runs, never seems to lose yardage by making the wrong cut or dancing at the line of scrimmage, powers through holes in short yardage situations, and catches the ball extremely well out of the backfield. It is that last trait that really reminds of me of LaDainian Tomlinson, who I think is probably a good player to use as a reference point when analyzing Gore.

In 2001, LaDainian's first in the NFL, he was an immediate starter for a 5-11 Chargers team. His inexperience and the lack of talent surrounding him that year is very similar to Gore's situation this season. And like Gore, LT came right out and proved himself to be a powerful runner with great instincts, balance, power, and hands. Therefore, despite the fact that he was a rookie and often facing eight-man fronts (thanks to Doug Flutie's noodle arm), Tomlinson was still able to have success, even against good teams and even when San Diego faced substantial deficits. For the year he was ninth in the NFL in rushing with 1,236 yards and seventh in rushing touchdowns with 10.

Now, I'm not saying that Gore is as talented as Tomlinson or that he will automatically achieve those totals, but it is a good place to start when trying to gauge Gore's numbers, given the similarity in their circumstances and skill sets.

In Tomlinson's first game that year, the Chargers manhandled the Redskins as LT totaled 125 yards and two touchdowns, good for 24 fantasy points. This is similar to the output we saw from Gore in Week One; his team was competitive and he amassed 26 fantasy points. However, as the season wore on for Tomlinson, the big games tailed off. He totaled over 20 fantasy points on only one other occasion and in the other 14 contests he scored over 10 points in half and under 10 in the other half. For the season, he average just under 13 fantasy points per contest and finished the year as the #7 running back and #11 player overall (in traditional scoring systems).

Again, while Gore is probably not the talent that Tomlinson is, I think he can match those fantasy numbers. Why? Because there is one element to his game and to San Francisco's play-calling that is superior to LT's in 2001, and that is the use of Gore as a receiver out of the backfield. In his rookie campaign, Tomlinson caught 59 passes for 367 yards and zero scores, which is okay, but nothing compared to what he did the next time the Chargers found themselves playing from behind game in and game out. In 2003, while breaking in Drew Brees at quarterback and losing 12 of 16 games, San Diego made great use of Tomlinson as a receiver; LT caught 100 passes for 725 yards and four touchdowns. Given Gore's six-catch, 83-yard performance in the opener, it seems that he can put up receiving numbers that fall somewhere between LT's rookie totals and those from his ridiculous third season.

Therefore, even if Gore falls short of LT's 1,236 rushing yards and comes in with something more like 1,050 or 1,100, it seems he can make up for it in the passing game. Not only will this keep him involved when the Niners trail, but it will also allow him to get touches without being at as great of a risk for injury.

That brings us to the final - and biggest - question about Gore. Can he stay healthy? It is the one aspect of this young running back that splinters off completely from the Tomlinson comparison. Last time I checked, LT didn't suffer multiple ACL tears in college or need a pair of shoulder surgeries the offseason before he became an NFL starter.

If Frank Gore can answer that last question and stay healthy for at least 15 of the Niners' 16 contests, I think he can match LT's first year as a starter and rank as one of the 10 best backs in the league, with numbers settling in somewhere around 1,600 total yards and 10-12 scores. (By the way, LaMont Jordan finished with 1,588 yards and 11 touchdowns last year in his first year as a starter on a 4-12 team, which is also not a bad comparison.)

Anyone else see bigger things for Gore? Anyone envisioning complete and utter failure?

Posted by Adam Hoff at 9/12/2006 7:09:00 PM

Comments (7)

Mike McCarthy: Real Man of Genius
I cannot stress enough how much I disliked the hiring of Mike McCarthy this past offseason, and while I'm trying really hard to give him a chance, this current Packers team looks to be the worst coached team I've seen in over 15 years. His play calling in the week one opener simply solidified him as the current titleholder of "Worst Head Coach in the NFL". Let's review the first three series of the game.

Series 1:
1st-10, GB17 12:05 A. Green rushed to the right for 3 yard gain
2nd-7, GB20 12:00 A. Green rushed to the right for 6 yard gain
3rd-1, GB26 11:26 A. Green rushed to the left for no gain
4th-1, GB26 10:59 J. Ryan punt.

Series 2:
1st-10, GB20 5:02 B. Favre passed to D. Driver to the right for 17 yard gain
1st-10, GB37 5:02 A. Green rushed up the middle for 3 yard gain
2nd-7, GB40 4:34 A. Green rushed to the left for 4 yard gain
3rd-3, GB44 3:59 B. Favre trips backing away from center for 2 yard loss.
4th-12, GB35 3:04 J. Ryan punt.

Series 3:
1st-10, GB22 13:44 B. Favre passed to D. Lee down the middle for 25 yard gain
1st-10, GB47 13:39 A. Green rushed up the middle for 7 yard gain
2nd-3, CHI46 13:13 A. Green rushed to the left for 2 yard gain
3rd-1, CHI44 12:33 A. Green rushed to the right for no gain
4th-1, CHI44 11:54 B. Favre QB sneak for no gain

The Bears kicked a FG on the next possession to go up 13-0.

In the first twelve offensive plays, nine were rushes and three were pass attempts. It's been so long since Favre has attempted a QB sneak that even he said that he can't remember the last time. Brilliant play call, Mike!

Favre was 2 for 2 for 2 for 42 yards. It's a good thing that McCarthy was smart enough to reign him in. God forbid that they actually try to gain enough yards to score a point or two. At the half, Favre was 5-for-5 for 70 yards, but McCarthy's obsession with running the ball did nothing but hold back the offense. By the time he decided to start throwing the ball, the Bears were playing with the lead and sitting in a deep zone.

This should come as no surprise to anyone, considering that he was the mastermind behind the 49ers offense last season. His ineptness goes beyond the offense, though. The team looks poorly coached at all aspects, and has for the entire preseason. I can't envision any successful season in Green Bay until a new regime is installed, which includes a new GM.

Posted by Herb Ilk at 9/12/2006 1:20:00 PM

Comments (5)

Reasons For Vikings Optimism
Entering the regular season the Vikings were kind of a mystery. Was Brad Childress the disiplinarian the team needed after years of coddling players or was he an overhyped assistant who didn't even call the plays as the offensive coordinator with the Eagles? Was a spread-the-ball offense a new team-first philosophy or a coverup for a lack of talent?

Aside from the final score (a win always looks good), there were signs the new regime is doing things the right way:

1) No turnovers

Remember when Mike Tice said his No. 1 goal each year was to limit turnovers? This coach finally practices what he preaches. (Not having turnover-happy Culpepper helps)

2) Playing smart

The Vikings didn't do anything stupid at the end of the game. When faced with a situation where they could run out the clock with about 2:30 left, they ran the ball behind their big offensive line and managed the clock. They didn't take Joe Theisman's usual dumb advice and throw the ball. They played the percentages and had faith in their defense. Denny Green or Mike Tice talked about their commitment to the run and yet always got pass happy as the game went along regardless of the score. In sum, the Vikings were smart in how they managed the game. When is the last time that was said about a Vikings coaching staff?

3) Players off-field actions had accountability

Dwight Smith was benched/made inactive as punishment when he was cited by police for indecent conduct last month. Koren Robinson was released after a DUI - even though the Packers signed him today. While you can debate whether a team is responsible for player's off-field actions, the message here is clear: the players won't be running the team. That's a definite turnaround from the Denny Green and Mike Tice eras, where it felt like the inmates somtimes ran the asylum.

So after Week 1, it looks like Vikings fans have more to root for on and off the field. The team just won't have those high-profile fantasy stars any longer, but what did that ever get them?

Posted by Peter Schoenke at 9/12/2006 12:04:00 AM

Comments (5)

Moss' Penalty for Taunting
Moss got a 15-yard penalty for flipping the ball to Nate Kaeding on the sideline after the catch. Is new commish Roger Goodell responsible for this b.s. new policy of ticky-tack foul calling on the league's "bad boys"? If so, he's off to a bad start.

And why won't Marty Schottenheimer let Philip Rivers play? I know they're up 13-0, but it's ridiculous to hand the ball off 20 times in a row when it's no longer working.

Posted by Chris Liss at 9/11/2006 9:15:00 PM

Comments (3)

Monday Night Football 9/11 Charade
I can't believe I just watched the governor of California in the MNF booth waxing patriotic with a firefighter from California. How ridiculous! The guy flew to NY, it seemed they were saying, AFTER 9/11 to help out. While that's a noble thing to do, and firefighting in general is a noble profession, why is this guy different from any garden variety fireman? And why couldn't they spring for a firefighter that was on the ground during 9/11? Not that it would make any difference, (it's all cheesy made-for-TV crap), but if you're going to play that card during the game, at least get a guy who risked his life on THAT DAY.



Posted by Chris Liss at 9/11/2006 9:08:00 PM

Comments (2)

What a Stupid Game
What a ripoff that Giants-Colts game was. That b.s. offensive pass interference call? Those refs were the dregs of humanity - what a bunch of senseless fools. As a ref, rule No. 1 should be DON'T EVER MAKE UP STUFF THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN. They thought Carter pushed off because the defender slipped, but they didn't SEE it. If you don't see it, don't infer it. Err on the side of missing the call rather than making up a call where none exists. That was a key first down, and instead put the Giants in second or third and long in their own end. Ridiculous. Of course, that's not half as bad as the five or six calls they jobbed Seattle with in the Super Bowl, but it's the same issue, and it damages the game.

On a side note, Jay Feely really blew it when he missed that easy kick. If it were up to me, he'd be running sprints after the game. The Colts run defense really blows. I've never seen a team so consistency run with such ease.

Posted by Chris Liss at 9/10/2006 8:28:00 PM

Comments (14)

Archives
4/13/2014 - 4/19/2014
4/6/2014 - 4/12/2014
3/30/2014 - 4/5/2014
3/23/2014 - 3/29/2014
3/16/2014 - 3/22/2014
3/9/2014 - 3/15/2014
3/2/2014 - 3/8/2014
2/23/2014 - 3/1/2014
2/16/2014 - 2/22/2014
2/9/2014 - 2/15/2014
2/2/2014 - 2/8/2014
1/26/2014 - 2/1/2014
1/19/2014 - 1/25/2014
1/12/2014 - 1/18/2014
1/5/2014 - 1/11/2014
12/29/2013 - 1/4/2014
12/22/2013 - 12/28/2013
12/15/2013 - 12/21/2013
12/8/2013 - 12/14/2013
12/1/2013 - 12/7/2013
11/24/2013 - 11/30/2013
11/17/2013 - 11/23/2013
11/10/2013 - 11/16/2013
11/3/2013 - 11/9/2013
10/27/2013 - 11/2/2013
10/20/2013 - 10/26/2013
10/13/2013 - 10/19/2013
10/6/2013 - 10/12/2013
9/29/2013 - 10/5/2013
9/22/2013 - 9/28/2013
9/15/2013 - 9/21/2013
9/8/2013 - 9/14/2013
9/1/2013 - 9/7/2013
8/25/2013 - 8/31/2013
8/18/2013 - 8/24/2013
8/11/2013 - 8/17/2013
8/4/2013 - 8/10/2013
7/28/2013 - 8/3/2013
7/21/2013 - 7/27/2013
7/14/2013 - 7/20/2013
7/7/2013 - 7/13/2013
6/30/2013 - 7/6/2013
6/23/2013 - 6/29/2013
6/16/2013 - 6/22/2013
6/9/2013 - 6/15/2013
6/2/2013 - 6/8/2013
5/26/2013 - 6/1/2013
5/19/2013 - 5/25/2013
5/12/2013 - 5/18/2013
5/5/2013 - 5/11/2013
4/28/2013 - 5/4/2013
4/21/2013 - 4/27/2013
4/14/2013 - 4/20/2013
4/7/2013 - 4/13/2013
3/31/2013 - 4/6/2013
3/24/2013 - 3/30/2013
3/17/2013 - 3/23/2013
3/10/2013 - 3/16/2013
3/3/2013 - 3/9/2013
2/24/2013 - 3/2/2013
2/17/2013 - 2/23/2013
2/10/2013 - 2/16/2013
2/3/2013 - 2/9/2013
1/27/2013 - 2/2/2013
1/20/2013 - 1/26/2013
1/13/2013 - 1/19/2013
1/6/2013 - 1/12/2013
12/30/2012 - 1/5/2013
12/23/2012 - 12/29/2012
12/16/2012 - 12/22/2012
12/9/2012 - 12/15/2012
12/2/2012 - 12/8/2012
11/25/2012 - 12/1/2012
11/18/2012 - 11/24/2012
11/11/2012 - 11/17/2012
11/4/2012 - 11/10/2012
10/28/2012 - 11/3/2012
10/21/2012 - 10/27/2012
10/14/2012 - 10/20/2012
10/7/2012 - 10/13/2012
9/30/2012 - 10/6/2012
9/23/2012 - 9/29/2012
9/16/2012 - 9/22/2012
9/9/2012 - 9/15/2012
9/2/2012 - 9/8/2012
8/26/2012 - 9/1/2012
8/19/2012 - 8/25/2012
8/12/2012 - 8/18/2012
8/5/2012 - 8/11/2012
7/29/2012 - 8/4/2012
7/22/2012 - 7/28/2012
7/15/2012 - 7/21/2012
7/8/2012 - 7/14/2012
7/1/2012 - 7/7/2012
6/24/2012 - 6/30/2012
6/17/2012 - 6/23/2012
6/10/2012 - 6/16/2012
6/3/2012 - 6/9/2012
5/27/2012 - 6/2/2012
5/20/2012 - 5/26/2012
5/13/2012 - 5/19/2012
5/6/2012 - 5/12/2012
4/29/2012 - 5/5/2012
4/22/2012 - 4/28/2012
4/15/2012 - 4/21/2012
4/8/2012 - 4/14/2012
4/1/2012 - 4/7/2012
3/25/2012 - 3/31/2012
3/18/2012 - 3/24/2012
3/11/2012 - 3/17/2012
3/4/2012 - 3/10/2012
2/26/2012 - 3/3/2012
2/19/2012 - 2/25/2012
2/12/2012 - 2/18/2012
2/5/2012 - 2/11/2012
1/29/2012 - 2/4/2012
1/22/2012 - 1/28/2012
1/15/2012 - 1/21/2012
1/8/2012 - 1/14/2012
1/1/2012 - 1/7/2012
12/25/2011 - 12/31/2011
12/18/2011 - 12/24/2011
12/11/2011 - 12/17/2011
12/4/2011 - 12/10/2011
11/27/2011 - 12/3/2011
11/20/2011 - 11/26/2011
11/13/2011 - 11/19/2011
11/6/2011 - 11/12/2011
10/30/2011 - 11/5/2011
10/23/2011 - 10/29/2011
10/16/2011 - 10/22/2011
10/9/2011 - 10/15/2011
10/2/2011 - 10/8/2011
9/25/2011 - 10/1/2011
9/18/2011 - 9/24/2011
9/11/2011 - 9/17/2011
9/4/2011 - 9/10/2011
8/28/2011 - 9/3/2011
8/21/2011 - 8/27/2011
8/14/2011 - 8/20/2011
8/7/2011 - 8/13/2011
7/31/2011 - 8/6/2011
7/24/2011 - 7/30/2011
7/17/2011 - 7/23/2011
7/10/2011 - 7/16/2011
7/3/2011 - 7/9/2011
6/26/2011 - 7/2/2011
6/19/2011 - 6/25/2011
6/12/2011 - 6/18/2011
6/5/2011 - 6/11/2011
5/29/2011 - 6/4/2011
5/22/2011 - 5/28/2011
5/15/2011 - 5/21/2011
5/8/2011 - 5/14/2011
5/1/2011 - 5/7/2011
4/24/2011 - 4/30/2011
4/17/2011 - 4/23/2011
4/10/2011 - 4/16/2011
4/3/2011 - 4/9/2011
3/27/2011 - 4/2/2011
3/20/2011 - 3/26/2011
3/13/2011 - 3/19/2011
3/6/2011 - 3/12/2011
2/27/2011 - 3/5/2011
2/20/2011 - 2/26/2011
2/13/2011 - 2/19/2011
2/6/2011 - 2/12/2011
1/30/2011 - 2/5/2011
1/23/2011 - 1/29/2011
1/16/2011 - 1/22/2011
1/9/2011 - 1/15/2011
1/2/2011 - 1/8/2011
12/26/2010 - 1/1/2011
12/19/2010 - 12/25/2010
12/12/2010 - 12/18/2010
12/5/2010 - 12/11/2010
11/28/2010 - 12/4/2010
11/21/2010 - 11/27/2010
11/14/2010 - 11/20/2010
11/7/2010 - 11/13/2010
10/31/2010 - 11/6/2010
10/24/2010 - 10/30/2010
10/17/2010 - 10/23/2010
10/10/2010 - 10/16/2010
10/3/2010 - 10/9/2010
9/26/2010 - 10/2/2010
9/19/2010 - 9/25/2010
9/12/2010 - 9/18/2010
9/5/2010 - 9/11/2010
8/29/2010 - 9/4/2010
8/22/2010 - 8/28/2010
8/15/2010 - 8/21/2010
8/8/2010 - 8/14/2010
8/1/2010 - 8/7/2010
7/25/2010 - 7/31/2010
7/18/2010 - 7/24/2010
7/11/2010 - 7/17/2010
7/4/2010 - 7/10/2010
6/27/2010 - 7/3/2010
6/20/2010 - 6/26/2010
6/13/2010 - 6/19/2010
6/6/2010 - 6/12/2010
5/30/2010 - 6/5/2010
5/23/2010 - 5/29/2010
5/16/2010 - 5/22/2010
5/9/2010 - 5/15/2010
5/2/2010 - 5/8/2010
4/25/2010 - 5/1/2010
4/18/2010 - 4/24/2010
4/11/2010 - 4/17/2010
4/4/2010 - 4/10/2010
3/28/2010 - 4/3/2010
3/21/2010 - 3/27/2010
3/14/2010 - 3/20/2010
3/7/2010 - 3/13/2010
2/28/2010 - 3/6/2010
2/21/2010 - 2/27/2010
2/14/2010 - 2/20/2010
2/7/2010 - 2/13/2010
1/31/2010 - 2/6/2010
1/24/2010 - 1/30/2010
1/17/2010 - 1/23/2010
1/10/2010 - 1/16/2010
1/3/2010 - 1/9/2010
12/27/2009 - 1/2/2010
12/20/2009 - 12/26/2009
12/13/2009 - 12/19/2009
12/6/2009 - 12/12/2009
11/29/2009 - 12/5/2009
11/22/2009 - 11/28/2009
11/15/2009 - 11/21/2009
11/8/2009 - 11/14/2009
11/1/2009 - 11/7/2009
10/25/2009 - 10/31/2009
10/18/2009 - 10/24/2009
10/11/2009 - 10/17/2009
10/4/2009 - 10/10/2009
9/27/2009 - 10/3/2009
9/20/2009 - 9/26/2009
9/13/2009 - 9/19/2009
9/6/2009 - 9/12/2009
8/30/2009 - 9/5/2009
8/23/2009 - 8/29/2009
8/16/2009 - 8/22/2009
8/9/2009 - 8/15/2009
8/2/2009 - 8/8/2009
7/26/2009 - 8/1/2009
7/19/2009 - 7/25/2009
7/12/2009 - 7/18/2009
7/5/2009 - 7/11/2009
6/28/2009 - 7/4/2009
6/21/2009 - 6/27/2009
6/14/2009 - 6/20/2009
6/7/2009 - 6/13/2009
5/31/2009 - 6/6/2009
5/24/2009 - 5/30/2009
5/17/2009 - 5/23/2009
5/10/2009 - 5/16/2009
5/3/2009 - 5/9/2009
4/26/2009 - 5/2/2009
4/19/2009 - 4/25/2009
4/12/2009 - 4/18/2009
4/5/2009 - 4/11/2009
3/29/2009 - 4/4/2009
3/22/2009 - 3/28/2009
3/15/2009 - 3/21/2009
3/8/2009 - 3/14/2009
3/1/2009 - 3/7/2009
2/22/2009 - 2/28/2009
2/15/2009 - 2/21/2009
2/8/2009 - 2/14/2009
2/1/2009 - 2/7/2009
1/25/2009 - 1/31/2009
1/18/2009 - 1/24/2009
1/11/2009 - 1/17/2009
1/4/2009 - 1/10/2009
12/28/2008 - 1/3/2009
12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008
12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008
12/7/2008 - 12/13/2008
11/30/2008 - 12/6/2008
11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008
11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008
11/9/2008 - 11/15/2008
11/2/2008 - 11/8/2008
10/26/2008 - 11/1/2008
10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008
10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008
10/5/2008 - 10/11/2008
9/28/2008 - 10/4/2008
9/21/2008 - 9/27/2008
9/14/2008 - 9/20/2008
9/7/2008 - 9/13/2008
8/31/2008 - 9/6/2008
8/24/2008 - 8/30/2008
8/17/2008 - 8/23/2008
8/10/2008 - 8/16/2008
8/3/2008 - 8/9/2008
7/27/2008 - 8/2/2008
7/20/2008 - 7/26/2008
7/13/2008 - 7/19/2008
7/6/2008 - 7/12/2008
6/29/2008 - 7/5/2008
6/22/2008 - 6/28/2008
6/15/2008 - 6/21/2008
6/8/2008 - 6/14/2008
6/1/2008 - 6/7/2008
5/25/2008 - 5/31/2008
5/18/2008 - 5/24/2008
5/11/2008 - 5/17/2008
5/4/2008 - 5/10/2008
4/27/2008 - 5/3/2008
4/20/2008 - 4/26/2008
4/13/2008 - 4/19/2008
4/6/2008 - 4/12/2008
3/30/2008 - 4/5/2008
3/23/2008 - 3/29/2008
3/16/2008 - 3/22/2008
3/9/2008 - 3/15/2008
3/2/2008 - 3/8/2008
2/24/2008 - 3/1/2008
2/17/2008 - 2/23/2008
2/10/2008 - 2/16/2008
2/3/2008 - 2/9/2008
1/27/2008 - 2/2/2008
1/20/2008 - 1/26/2008
1/13/2008 - 1/19/2008
1/6/2008 - 1/12/2008
12/30/2007 - 1/5/2008
12/23/2007 - 12/29/2007
12/16/2007 - 12/22/2007
12/9/2007 - 12/15/2007
12/2/2007 - 12/8/2007
11/25/2007 - 12/1/2007
11/18/2007 - 11/24/2007
11/11/2007 - 11/17/2007
11/4/2007 - 11/10/2007
10/28/2007 - 11/3/2007
10/21/2007 - 10/27/2007
10/14/2007 - 10/20/2007
10/7/2007 - 10/13/2007
9/30/2007 - 10/6/2007
9/23/2007 - 9/29/2007
9/16/2007 - 9/22/2007
9/9/2007 - 9/15/2007
9/2/2007 - 9/8/2007
8/26/2007 - 9/1/2007
8/19/2007 - 8/25/2007
8/12/2007 - 8/18/2007
8/5/2007 - 8/11/2007
7/29/2007 - 8/4/2007
7/22/2007 - 7/28/2007
7/15/2007 - 7/21/2007
7/8/2007 - 7/14/2007
7/1/2007 - 7/7/2007
6/24/2007 - 6/30/2007
6/17/2007 - 6/23/2007
6/10/2007 - 6/16/2007
6/3/2007 - 6/9/2007
5/27/2007 - 6/2/2007
5/20/2007 - 5/26/2007
5/13/2007 - 5/19/2007
5/6/2007 - 5/12/2007
4/29/2007 - 5/5/2007
4/22/2007 - 4/28/2007
4/15/2007 - 4/21/2007
4/8/2007 - 4/14/2007
4/1/2007 - 4/7/2007
3/25/2007 - 3/31/2007
3/18/2007 - 3/24/2007
3/11/2007 - 3/17/2007
3/4/2007 - 3/10/2007
2/25/2007 - 3/3/2007
2/18/2007 - 2/24/2007
2/11/2007 - 2/17/2007
2/4/2007 - 2/10/2007
1/28/2007 - 2/3/2007
1/21/2007 - 1/27/2007
1/14/2007 - 1/20/2007
1/7/2007 - 1/13/2007
12/31/2006 - 1/6/2007
12/24/2006 - 12/30/2006
12/17/2006 - 12/23/2006
12/10/2006 - 12/16/2006
12/3/2006 - 12/9/2006
11/26/2006 - 12/2/2006
11/19/2006 - 11/25/2006
11/12/2006 - 11/18/2006
11/5/2006 - 11/11/2006
10/29/2006 - 11/4/2006
10/22/2006 - 10/28/2006
10/15/2006 - 10/21/2006
10/8/2006 - 10/14/2006
10/1/2006 - 10/7/2006
9/24/2006 - 9/30/2006
9/17/2006 - 9/23/2006
9/10/2006 - 9/16/2006
9/3/2006 - 9/9/2006
8/27/2006 - 9/2/2006
8/20/2006 - 8/26/2006
8/13/2006 - 8/19/2006
8/6/2006 - 8/12/2006
7/30/2006 - 8/5/2006
7/23/2006 - 7/29/2006
7/16/2006 - 7/22/2006
7/9/2006 - 7/15/2006
7/2/2006 - 7/8/2006
6/25/2006 - 7/1/2006
6/18/2006 - 6/24/2006
6/11/2006 - 6/17/2006
6/4/2006 - 6/10/2006
5/28/2006 - 6/3/2006
5/21/2006 - 5/27/2006
5/14/2006 - 5/20/2006
5/7/2006 - 5/13/2006
4/30/2006 - 5/6/2006
4/23/2006 - 4/29/2006
4/16/2006 - 4/22/2006
4/9/2006 - 4/15/2006
4/2/2006 - 4/8/2006
3/26/2006 - 4/1/2006
3/19/2006 - 3/25/2006
3/12/2006 - 3/18/2006
3/5/2006 - 3/11/2006
2/26/2006 - 3/4/2006
2/19/2006 - 2/25/2006
2/12/2006 - 2/18/2006
2/5/2006 - 2/11/2006
1/29/2006 - 2/4/2006
1/22/2006 - 1/28/2006
1/15/2006 - 1/21/2006
1/8/2006 - 1/14/2006
1/1/2006 - 1/7/2006