Ask an ExpertPaying subscribers are allowed to ask our experts two questions per week.
You are currently not logged in. To login, you can use the boxes in the upper left.
To create an account, Click Here. Here are some recent football questions our experts have received, along with their responses: If this was the final four who would you choose to match up in the championship? and would who would you pick to win? Ken vs Ari, and Duke vs Virginia I have a very similar Final Four actually, except I have Michigan State instead of Virginia. So my Final, just like yours, would be Kentucky-Duke, with Kentucky cutting down the nets.
Alright points keeper league with absurd setup, question for you guys. Points are as follows Hitters- tb 1, r 1, sb 1, bb 1, rbi 1 and k -1 Pitchers- IP 3, W 10, S 5, hit -1, er -2, L -5, k 1, bb -1 As far as keepers go you can keep up to 3 people and its the 1st 3 rounds, keep 2 its the 1st 2 rounds etc. Normal espn roster except 3 rp and 6 sp, the league has a maximum 180 starts for the season. That said here's the 5 I'm down to for my keepers. Jose Abreu Jose Altuve Michael Brantley Chris Sale Johnny Cueto Gotta keep Abreu and Cueto for sure. Then for the last keeper, I'd proobably go Brantley given he will draw walks and Altuve won't. Good luck, Dave Regan
Hi there, I'm in a pretty shallow standard yahoo league. Is it possibly time to cut Tyler Bozak? I tried some trades but no luck. Guys like: Mike Fisher, Turris, RNH, Santorelli, Nielsen are available, Same question for Ryan McDonagh. I've had great luck with Brassard/Stepan but McDonagh slowed down. Available D: Barrie, Faulk, Daley, Jack Johnson, Klein, Klingberg. Thanks, John Hi John, I like Bozak but his ability to put up points on the board is really tied to Kessel - if Kessel is cold, which he is right now, then Bozak won't do much for you. Plus there is a real negative vibe surrounding the Leafs right now which they are having trouble shaking. I would not hesitate to cash him in for a guy like Fisher who is a much more consistent scorer, and playing on a better team. Similar for McDonagh, he is having trouble replicating the great season he had last year, possibly because he is no longer the top dog anymore with Boyle now in the fold. Barrie is having a good year with the Avs this season so he's probably the better pick right now. Good luck, -Mark
Thank you guys for all your help and advice. I was in four fantasy football leagues and I won three championships!!! I NEVER won I football before!!! The one I did not win is a free league so... oh well(laughing). Even though I didn't always follow your advice, rotowire's analysis provided me much needed clarity. You guys analyze EVERY aspect of the game and it is PHENOMENAL!!! I wish I could tell people how good Rotowire is, but I can't reveal my source. All I can say is THANK YOU, and I couldn't have done it without you and God. Thank you for all the kind words, very much appreciated. We're happy to help. You deserve all the credit though, you're making the roster moves and lineup decisions. Excellent job, winning three of four leagues is one heck of an accomplishment in the fickle world of fantasy football. Here's to a repeat performance in 2015, it'll be here before you know it.
Hi there! With my draft slot I will most likely get the opportunity to choose either of these TE's with my 3rd or 4th round pick... Would you recommend Gronk or Julius Thomas? Thanks! Dan Dan, That's a tough question. In a Peyton Manning-led offense, there's always the potential to post huge numbers. It would be unwise, however, to expect the Broncos or Manning to match last year's record-setting level of production, so it's likely everyone will take at least a small step backwards. Thomas may also has some inconsistency issues as he is just one of a plethora of offensive weapons in Denver, and Manning is one who is never shy to spread the wealth. As such, I'd probably lean towards Gronkowski. Unquestionably, he's a much riskier pick given his unforgiving injury history. The upside, however, is tremendous; remember, he had 11 touchdowns in 2012 and 17 in 2011. With the Patriots' shaky wide receiver options, it wouldn't be surprising to see Tom Brady lean on Gronk more than ever, IF he can stay healthy. That's a mighty big IF but the sky's the limit if he can stay on the field. Thanks for the question, and good luck! -Justin Fielkow
I'm in a 10-team PPR keeper league that starts 1QB, 2WR, 2RB, 1TE, 2Flex, D and K, with 6 guys on the bench, so we have to go deep. We're allowed no more than 3 keepers from previous year. I can, and will, keep Foles at QB (since I picked him up as a FA and only have to pay a 10th for him), and probably D. Thomas at WR (w/a 3rd, after keeping him with a 5th last year). Which of the following RBs should I keep: Bell (with a 4th), Morris (8th, previous keeper) or Andre Ellington (10th)? If I try to trade Morris pre-draft, what's a good value? While it's really tough to address what's "good value" for a player like Morris (as it's largely dependent on your trade partners' willingness to deal and their available options), to answer the first part of your question, I'd lean towards Ellington. While I view both Morris and Bell as "safer" options, neither offers Ellington's upside, particularly in a PPR league. Morris, for example, continues to be held back by his lack of receptions. He should continue to see a big workload for Washington, but under a new coaching regime, there's no guarantees about his role. Bell, meanwhile, is a young back who proved he was capable of handling a stout workload as a rookie. But, Bell averaged a lowly 3.5 YPC behind a porous Steelers' offensive line. The team also added LeGarrette Blount - who is clearly not a superstar or even a threat to Bell's hold on the starting gig - but still represents a much more real threat to Bell's workload than last year's pu pu platter of running back options. Ellington almost certainly won't see the rushload of Morris or Bell given his smaller statute but his path of touches is almost unrivaled. After 39 receptions last year despite ceding significant playing time to Rashard Mendenhall's corpse, it's not unreasonable to expect that number to rise as Arizona seeks to feed the ball to their explosive back. With a 10th round keeper price, Ellington makes for a high-value selection on draft day. Thanks for the question, and good luck! -Justin Fielkow
I'm in a 10 team point per completion league with 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, and 1 Flex (RB/WR/TE). I've customized the player rankings to account for the format and scoring and seen the changes. But I'm still not comfortable that I understand the draft strategy to follow. Does the PPC scoring make it smart to draft a QB really early since they will be accounting for a huge portion of my team's points? Or should I risk it and take a QB later? I looked for an article on the site that addressed this and couldn't find anything... Typically in standard scoring leagues, the difference between the top-ranked QB and the 10th is significantly less that the top-ranked RB and the 20th (since owners start at least 2 RBS but only one QB). This is heightened by the fact that owners start only one QB but multiple RBs, mitigating the percentage of points a QB contributes to a fantasy team's weekly point total. Last year was obviously an exception to the rule with Peyton Manning's record-setting campaign, but the typical mantra under such a value-based draft strategy is that because you can find a solid QB later in the draft, it makes little sense to waste a high draft pick on a QB when elite RBs are more valuable and scarce. But in a point-per-completion (PPC) league, QBs will undoubtedly score more points than they did in standard league. As a result, QB points will make up a larger percentage of your team's weekly point totals, putting an increased emphasis on premium play from that position. Because of that, elite QBs - particularly those with high-volume pass attempts (i.e. Drew Brees) - become of even greater importance to your team's performance. Additionally, and arguably more importantly, the difference between elite and non-elite QBs becomes starker. Under standard scoring, Brees, the second-best fantasy QB by points in 2013 (357 points), scored just under 100 points more than the 10th-ranked QB, Tony Romo (260 points). But, under a PPC system, Brees (446 completions) would have scored 200 points(!) more than Romo (342 completions). The difference is even further accentuated when looking at the 8th- and 9th-highest scoring QBs in 2013, Russell Wilson (257 completions) and Colin Kaepernick (243 completions). To sum, not only do elite QBs become a more valuable commodity because they account for a higher percentage of your fantasy team's weekly points, but the gap between the best and league-average options widens. Therefore, it becomes increasingly more important to snag a top-flight quarterback early in your draft under such a scoring system. Thanks for the question, and good luck! -Justin Fielkow