RotoWire Partners
RotoWire Blogs
All Sports
Recent Comments
Featured Bloggers
Chris Liss
Jeff Erickson
Dalton Del Don
Andre' Snellings
Erik Siegrist
Jason Thornbury
Peter Schoenke
About RSS
More info
Baseball Commissioner
Fantasy Football News
Fantasy Football Draft Kit
Fantasy Football Magazine
Football Draft Software
Fantasy Baseball News
Draft Kit
Draft Software
Email Reports
Email Preferences Fantasy Baseball Blog
Search All of Blogs:

BlogsAll Sports   Baseball   Football   Basketball   Hockey   Golf  

Ichiro is Japanese for "Super Rich"
Posted by Jason Thornbury at 7/13/2007 12:12:00 AM
View more posts by this author


The varied reactions to Ichiro's contract extension, which he'll likely sign Friday, have not been surprising. On one hand, Marlins president David Samson called the reported five-year, $18-$20 million contract, "a joke, it's inexcusable, it's complete mismanagement." Samson doesn't stop there either, listen here (if you can get past his movie reviews in the first few minutes -- apparently he likes to play Roger Ebert when he's not firing the manager of the year).

On the other hand, the case has been made that the deal is actually a bargain for the Mariners. If you want the math, read here, but here's the gist: Ichiro is about 60 runs better than the average center fielder, which translates to about eight wins better than a replacement-level center fielder. Factoring in a natural decline in skills makes Ichiro worth about 25 wins to the team over the course of the contract. Teams paid $4 million per win last offseason, meaning Ichiro is worth at least $100 million over the five years, more if you figure in salary inflation.

To me, it's often the years, not the money, that make a deal bad. Forget the money in Zito's deal, that contract is bad because the Giants bought a declining pitcher for seven years. Giving five years to Ichiro, who will approach 39 in the contract's last year, is a bit of a concern.

However, if I'm the Mariners, I'd suck it up if that's the best I could get. The reason goes back to a Bill James theory: "Uniqueness is a fundamental test of quality." Ichiro is arguably the most unqiue player in baseball. And who's better at his position? Sizemore? and ... Beltran? Beltran is owed $18.5 mil per year the next four years. Even though he's 3.5 years younger than Ichiro, who would you rather have at that amount?

Now, if you subscribe to the theory that speedsters don't age any worse than slow guys, then the years shouldn't worry you as much. And as for the money, well, in my book it's not the Arod-sized contracts that kill a club, it's the three-year, $9.15 million to the likes of Scott Spiezio; the four years, $50 million to Richie Sexson; the four years, $37.5 million to Jarrod Washburn, etc. etc.


And this isn't even taking into account the marketing power of Ichiro. How many Ichiro jerseys are out there? How many extra fans come to Mariners games simply to watch Ichiro? They're certainly not lining up to see Horacio Ramirez and Richie Sexson.
Posted by vtadave at 7/13/2007 8:46:00 AM
Ichiro is a steal at that price. Look at Kenny Lofton, somehow CF's last forever-see also Ricky Henderson (uh, ok not Bernie Williams). Ichiro does what he's supposed, get on base. How much better would his numbers be if he played for the Yanks or Boston with actual hitters behind him? Not to mention the marketing issues we in the fantasy world forget about thatvtadave mentioned (good point). Interesting argument Ichiro vs. A HEALTHY Beltran for relatively the same price (Ichiro will never have 40-40 capability, Beltran will never have Ichiro's OBP, etc..).
Posted by kevinccp at 7/13/2007 4:14:00 PM
The problem is that you will likely be comparing Ichiro's stats to other right fielders again in a year or two, as Adam (not Pacman) Jones looks like the future in center in Seattle.
Posted by Dalton Del Don at 7/14/2007 8:53:00 AM
Jones will play right. Ichiro is cemented in center. It's seems hard to justify $17 million a year for a guy who's best years are probably behind him, but, all things considered, it's a pretty good deal.

Posted by Jason Thornbury at 7/14/2007 8:21:00 PM
Well you have to throw out the marketing points because I would imagine that we are talking about a baseball decision here. While he is definitely a unique hitter who bats 320+ every year, the fact remains that he has never hit more than 15 Hrs or driven in 70 RBIs.It is difficult to field a competitive team when your highest paid player cannot bat 3rd or 4th for you while he eats up 35% of your team payroll.
Posted by nayfel at 7/17/2007 9:15:00 AM

You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to log in or register with