The Z Files: How Does Changing Divisions Affect ERA?

The Z Files: How Does Changing Divisions Affect ERA?

This article is part of our The Z Files series.

It was beginning to appear that the Yankees acquisition of Juan Soto was going to be the only major trade of the offseason until the Orioles and Brewers hooked up with Corbin Burnes on the move to the AL East. Everyone agreed that the trade benefits Burnes in terms of home ballpark and run support. However, there was concern regarding the change of divisions from the perceived weaker NL Central to the supposedly stronger AL East.

Determining divisional strength is a slippery slope, since the rosters of the teams change every season. Not to mention, hitters don't face the pitchers on their own team, and vice versa. Even so, the aggregate ERA a team's hitters encountered, and the combined wOBA in the box against a team's pitchers can be determined.

ERA may be noisy for individual pitchers, but when you're looking at a team ERA, it's representative of the quality of the staff. It's not perfect, but wOBA (weighted on base average) is a good proxy for the quality of a player's, or team's offense. It is a souped up version of OBP where the components are all assigned a coefficient according to the run scoring matrix.

The methodology to quantify division strength is using each team's schedule and averaging the opponent's wOBA and ERA for all 162 games. When a team is at home, the road ERA of the opponent is the input. When the team is on the road, the home ERA of the host is used in

It was beginning to appear that the Yankees acquisition of Juan Soto was going to be the only major trade of the offseason until the Orioles and Brewers hooked up with Corbin Burnes on the move to the AL East. Everyone agreed that the trade benefits Burnes in terms of home ballpark and run support. However, there was concern regarding the change of divisions from the perceived weaker NL Central to the supposedly stronger AL East.

Determining divisional strength is a slippery slope, since the rosters of the teams change every season. Not to mention, hitters don't face the pitchers on their own team, and vice versa. Even so, the aggregate ERA a team's hitters encountered, and the combined wOBA in the box against a team's pitchers can be determined.

ERA may be noisy for individual pitchers, but when you're looking at a team ERA, it's representative of the quality of the staff. It's not perfect, but wOBA (weighted on base average) is a good proxy for the quality of a player's, or team's offense. It is a souped up version of OBP where the components are all assigned a coefficient according to the run scoring matrix.

The methodology to quantify division strength is using each team's schedule and averaging the opponent's wOBA and ERA for all 162 games. When a team is at home, the road ERA of the opponent is the input. When the team is on the road, the home ERA of the host is used in the calculation. This accounts for park factors. The same principle is used for wOBA.

Let's start by looking at the ERA each division's batters faced each of the past three seasons.

ERA Faced by Batters

 202320222021
AL East4.273.914.30
AL Central4.333.944.35
AL West4.333.874.29
NL East4.354.014.22
NL Central4.354.084.27
NL West4.364.024.18

The run environment changes yearly, so to get a more accurate perspective, let's normalize ERA to the league average each season. A level of 100 means the ERA faced was exactly league average. Over 100 means the division faced better pitching while under 100 indicates the division faced worse pitching.

Normalized ERA Faced

 202320222021
AL East101.3101.399.1
AL Central100.0100.698.0
AL West100.1102.399.3
NL East99.598.8101.0
NL Central99.497.199.8
NL West99.498.5101.9

Keep in mind the above is not the aggregate ERA of the division, but the quality of pitching each division's hitters encountered. For example, last season, in the aggregate, AL East batters faced the toughest pitching while every team in the National League faced arms just a little below average.

There's some variance year to year, so last season's pattern isn't likely to repeat this year. That said, projections can be used to, well, project the 2024 results. Though, I'm not sure there is much utility.

Here is the wOBA data. By means of reminder, this is what each division's pitchers faced.

wOBA Faced by Pitchers

 202320222021
AL East0.3200.3100.317
AL Central0.3180.3060.314
AL West0.3200.3070.314
NL East0.3230.3110.314
NL Central0.3220.3110.313
NL West0.3220.3110.314

Normalized wOBA Faced

 202320222021
AL East99.8100.0101.0
AL Central99.298.9100.1
AL West99.899.0100.0
NL East100.5100.5100.1
NL Central100.2100.399.6
NL West100.3100.499.9

Above 100 indicates the division's pitchers faced better hitters, whereas below 100 shows the pitcher's squared off with lesser batters. As such, NL East pitchers faced the most productive hitting of any division, with the AL Central toeing the rubber against the softest bats.

Projecting these numbers for 2024 may be a fool's errand, but last season's results can be used to normalize an individual player's production. This is routinely done via park factors. Why can't it also be done for quality of opponent faced?

2023 ERA and wOBA Faced by Team

TeamERAwOBA
ARI4.330.322
ATL4.360.320
BAL4.280.320
BOS4.220.321
CHC4.390.320
CIN4.330.321
CLE4.340.318
COL4.260.324
CWS4.330.319
DET4.360.319
HOU4.390.320
KC4.240.319
LAA4.330.321
LAD4.390.321
MIA4.370.324
MIL4.390.322
MIN4.390.317
NYM4.360.324
NYY4.300.322
OAK4.250.323
PHI4.370.321
PIT4.330.323
SD4.390.320
SEA4.360.320
SF4.410.322
STL4.330.322
TB4.270.318
TEX4.310.318
TOR4.300.321
WSH4.300.323

According to the data, Red Sox hitters faced the best pitching while Giants batters stepped in against the poorest collective hurlers. On the flip side, Rockies pitchers were saddled with squaring off with the most productive batters, with Twins pitchers enjoyed the luxury of pitching to the weakest set of bats.

Let's use the data to translate Burnes' ERA to what it would have been with the Orioles, without considering the park change.

Burnes ERA was 3.39, pitching to batters with a composite .322 wOBA. What would it have been if he faced hitters with a .320 wOBA? Of course, this presumes Burnes faced the average of what the Brewers' staff faced, which isn't likely the case, but works for the purpose of this estimate.

As hinted at earlier, the wOBA a team faces correlates very well with their staff ERA. As such, the wOBA faced can be converted into the expected ERA facing that set of batters.

For those interested in the math:

xERA = (wOBA - .188)/.031

For those just wanting the results, pitchers facing the Brewers should sport an aggregate 4.37 ERA compared to 4.31 against the Orioles. This means Burnes' 3.39 ERA would have been 3.34 with Baltimore. By comparison, going strictly by park factors, Burnes' ERA with the Orioles would have been 3.26.

When normalizing Burnes' ERA for projection purposes, both factors need to be taken into account. In a big-picture sense, the change of venue would have been much more helpful to Burnes than the quality of opposing batters, which may be counterintuitive.

Ultimately, the relative differences depend on the park factors. If the run index for the old and new venue is the same, the only change emanates from the quality of opponent. However, the nuts-and-bolts message of this study is changing teams/division doesn't affect performance as much as many intuit.

Want to Read More?
Subscribe to RotoWire to see the full article.

We reserve some of our best content for our paid subscribers. Plus, if you choose to subscribe you can discuss this article with the author and the rest of the RotoWire community.

Get Instant Access To This Article Get Access To This Article
RotoWire Community
Join Our Subscriber-Only MLB Chat
Chat with our writers and other RotoWire MLB fans for all the pre-game info and in-game banter.
Join The Discussion
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Todd Zola
Todd has been writing about fantasy baseball since 1997. He won NL Tout Wars and Mixed LABR in 2016 as well as a multi-time league winner in the National Fantasy Baseball Championship. Todd is now setting his sights even higher: The Rotowire Staff League. Lord Zola, as he's known in the industry, won the 2013 FSWA Fantasy Baseball Article of the Year award and was named the 2017 FSWA Fantasy Baseball Writer of the Year. Todd is a five-time FSWA awards finalist.
Collette Calls: Does Controlling the Running Game Really Matter?
Collette Calls: Does Controlling the Running Game Really Matter?
Farm Futures: Rookie Pitcher Targets
Farm Futures: Rookie Pitcher Targets
Offseason Deep Dives: Sean Manaea
Offseason Deep Dives: Sean Manaea
RotoWire Roundtable: 2025 Fantasy Baseball Top-300 Rankings
RotoWire Roundtable: 2025 Fantasy Baseball Top-300 Rankings